that the conclusion just as a coalition, that the "progressive" ideology pervades the cluster and take tea with the PC, leaving out the DC, that the PS-DC marriage is meaningless without power, but to stay together for the children (voters 'center') or for convenience, that you out militants MEO to PS but both parties seek to close with because he needs, that will go well with Arrate militants PS, that from DC to PC will be many unemployed but with good savings (NGOs, people living in projects, business of poverty, cooperation, We, bureaucrats and reformist several), that some PCs will migrate to extra-parliamentary left ... well, calculations, speculations, nothing more and less interesting to see how the reorganization of the enemy.
And although the organization of the powerful and power hungry is fundamental analysis will always be done from our reality, so the call is to discuss the state of our self-organization as a class. In the field
union, student and population, with the Social Democrats, spread the instrumentalization of the protests, the machinations and agreements without the bases, bureaucratization and perpetuation of the leaders close to power. In other words, these spaces could be an expression of social self are places of concentration of power, passive and submissive bases, if not disrupted by the apathy. Now, none of this is just a change of government, but the scenario could be:
• Those who won the elections and the deepening of
disorganization disorganization below ground is fundamental to docile and malleable to the political, economic and moral, where in fact the elected government sector never ceased to take precedence. So, first come is labor flexibility, it is the legal priority of entrepreneurs who want to freedom of layoffs and will tend to atomize most workers will move from one job to another to survive. On the other hand, a state focused on crime will result in a police state, with more control and repression, and more intervention in the territories and further criminalization of those who do not give in to their policies. Nothing too different from the past 20 years, but accelerated for the benefit of the privileged.
• Those who lost the election and focus on the social leaderships
Those who no doubt will again seek power (all those who bet on the elections overshadowing any moral minimum effort to seek an end to exploitation and oppression) revitalize basic fronts to keep their voters and try to make a difference with the government. Not only seek to strengthen its presence in the CUT, health unions, student associations, neighborhood units, etc. but also seek to control those leaders who do not possess. The only certainty to believe that not only is the PC who hegemonic fronts as it has been mostly up now, it's called "federation of citizens" who has made statements MEO and also from the vision unit (Tohá) Coalition now has the "open arms" to citizens "Requiring more closeness and participation."
Thus, both groups can keep their tentacles deeper bases its methods and cornering the limited possibilities that remained in the popular field.
then: it is essential to promote the practice and its conceptualization, the relationship between experiences, self-critical and non-partisan politicization of the bases, finally nothing more than the avant-garde self-organization without calculators. Building from the bottom up will be resistance to the penetration of state and instrumentation that make the power-hungry. Our
task remains intact against the same structures: Capitalism and State. The alert is the same: to atomize people, hegemonize, bureaucratic and dominated by the leaders. Towards the social self! ... with the same urgency as always.
By Sandro
0 comments:
Post a Comment