Anarchism and Anarchist Organization Policy Statement Extended
A contribution to the debate the expansion of anarchist organization
On 9 January, an anarchist meeting in reference to the commemoration of the 10th anniversary of establishment of the Quack, culminated two days of exhibition practices, experiences, work fronts, in reference to what is described as "social anarchism", saying that the current context requires positioning the idea in social construction.
But not culminate in any way, but with an exchange of views and ideas, individually and collectively, for the formation of a national organizational reference. On the origin of the proposal and intentions, any opinion would be just speculation by lack of information and distorting the intention of this op-ed, in addition to diluting the substantive discussion that seeks to support based on experience. Consider organizing
politics as strategy goes hand in hand with the need to consider such propagation to that, the organization is essential for macro scopes are searched.
The substance of the proposal is given by the need for some coordination at the national level, as regards class, union and individuals scattered, coordination and dissemination of ideas. But for every participant in more than one instance of political and anarchist social policy is the duty not to ignore the processes already experienced and that make sense with new experiences and lifelong libertarian concerns.
Focus on building a national organic short-medium term in the current context of anarchist organization lacks a proper diagnosis, it is expected that this is the first step and the call made to the establishment of such should be the trigger to make such a rigorous evaluation. Vices persist we disintegrated. There's no emphasis on the premise of building from below, not prioritized in the social, there are militants with emphasis on theory (tables with no practice) game of egos, lust for power (manifested in the appropriation that some make the organic), alliances on policy decisions, etc.., up to the biggest and greatest obstacle: lack of self-criticism.
not imagine the organization without criticism, without evaluation. Freedom is achieved in the questioning, the fight is critical and should begin at home. Such self-criticism has to be deep and analytical, as complacency is the most direct route to the horror of error. Many dissolved organics, streams, how much work undone and waste, but is not yet self-critical.
The meeting discussed the seriousness of self-indulgence and the pursuit of self-criticism, self-criticism but not heard, not promises, just do it. Methodological contradictions must be resolved, authoritarian vices removed, the desire to lead and eliminated the conflicts of power, the discussion should be encouraged and questioning is the beginning, the criticism should be installed as a pillar of the movement, but in vain boast anarchism of dynamism.
addition, greater coordination needed to be supported by social bases. The organization does not come to meet problems of identity, or disability cover generation of self-organization of each subject or group of subjects. This must be built independent of whether or not a political organization. Here, then, is that the political organization is to strengthen, coordinate work.
agree on the need for extended organic, but also repair any social structure that moves with suspicion. Confidence is lost. Entered as many as many classmates stopped calling each other. The appeal made to form the organic national should be used as the print element to force our own radical reformulation.
Self-criticism for re-directing our efforts toward libertarian communism to promoting grassroots self-organization: the social self, thus regaining the trust, so that in 10 years let's not speak of "social anarchism" to speak of "basic anarchism." Compa
anonymous. Report
0 comments:
Post a Comment