is no coincidence that the meeting had been held five anarcho-communist organizations in the role, different. "An important step in the search, perhaps lost, in the trunk lines of Anarchism (somewhat diverted by the political practice of OCL) or backward leap in the development of libertarian communism Creole?. I missed
greater emphasis on those aspects led key partners to give OCL to raise specific organizational projects. I was struck by the echo of the Libertarian Communist Organization had not echo this publicly to understand their perspective in a debate with high-minded political and ideological aspects of successive breaks within the organization. Apparently we have to wait to build oral history with its nuances (if not cahuin) breaking processes (political, methodological or otherwise) that have occurred since the creation of Quack, or go see how they develop the events to understand the excessive "respect" that was in the encounter, unlike the forum on "Criminalization of Anarchism", rather more tense atmosphere which helped to understand when the currents in anarchism. Anyway, should not be confused with omission fraternal.
On the first day there were hints of debate, but nothing is said of the Social War proclaimed by a partner, or seventies line of anarchist political organization in Latin America (FAU for 70 / Libertarian Resistance in Argentina) proposed by a . Mention was made in respect of contributions, so to speak, of the counterculture to the spread of libertarian ideas (otherwise undeniable), but never colleagues urged these organizations to conduct self-criticism whatsoever for consideration to, if you will, sectors "immature" libertarian spectrum, as was made clear by the sociologist Philip Tombolini at the meeting. Anarchism
as mass political organization, political organization of tables or counter-cultural movement seemed to open as early debate (...) nobody went. Apparently, there was agreement not to "aggression" or perhaps undeniable degree of dispersion of all these years have made it possible to focus on issues of major importance. The second day
Although there was no friction and many expected the occurrence of groups willing to discuss, that never happened. From this initiative are many more questions open than categorical conclusions and it seems that those elements that give force to the currents of anarchism continue without the necessary contrast to when making political reading of context.
Reflections on post-meeting (s) of organization (s) anarcho-communist (s)
organizations operating unit while they allow their internal processes and as the context requires a particular mode of organization. From the above Could it be that five Anarcho-communist organizations in one city is synonymous with maturity in one move?. Maybe, maybe not, let's see: 1 .-
strictly instrumental unit without internal democratic development mechanisms in many peer generates antibodies and cause fragmentation of the organizations or the diversion of militants into other streams of Anarchism. In addition, the tactical and strategic element considered has been the historical cause of breaks, rupture of relations between partners and has become good enough argument for subjects in the process of politicization of anarchism have decided to take other avenues to channel their revolutionary momentum or simply is have decided to "hang up his gloves." Balance between political and militant discipline and political development internal dialectic, should be able to be implemented to overcome the failed model of anarcho-communist organization that led the CUACOS when it became OCL.
2 .- The political maturation of subjects and groups, are mixed. Anarchism is a "system" vast ideological shades, definitions, historical patterns of social practices and economic policies that hinder the definition of rational processes in a particular form of organization and political interpretation of context. Therefore, the federal model should become an occasion for an exchange of practical experiences based on the fundamental consideration that each person and community has defined as its area of \u200b\u200bintervention and deployment. The program is the synthesis of the most successful and likely to provide screening at the time. Research and information flow will allow everyone is aware of each area and make it possible to turn the internal quality development, essential for developing strategies according to context and improve deployment militant in our social and popular organizations.
3 .- All the political organizations reflect inside the model of society to which they aspire. They range from the most authoritarian to those that are, but also nuance their authoritarianism Primary (or primary elections for the social-democrats). In the revolutionary left underground mixing politics with the insertion in popular sectors separate point is non-discrimination among its methods of direct or indirect cooperation with state agencies, worrying about the educational process within popular organizations, becoming renewed professional version (literally) of that edge that all instrumented.
How this will be resolved within a federation of organizations and individuals Anarcho-Communists in Chile?, is a good question, the fact is that inside should reflect the society that seeks to materialize, but only serve as a front for caudillos that abound within the Libertarian Communist power in this part of Latin America. By Ramón
Health and Anarchy! Top
organized people!
those who struggle!
0 comments:
Post a Comment